Comparison of hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide (TH-302) and ifosfamide in preclinical non-small cell lung cancer models

JD Sun, Q Liu, D Ahluwalia, DJ Ferraro… - Cancer biology & …, 2016 - Taylor & Francis
JD Sun, Q Liu, D Ahluwalia, DJ Ferraro, Y Wang, D Jung, MD Matteucci, CP Hart
Cancer biology & therapy, 2016Taylor & Francis
ABSTRACT Evofosfamide (TH-302) is a hypoxia-activated prodrug of the cytotoxin bromo-
isophosphoramide. In hypoxic conditions Br-IPM is released and alkylates DNA. Ifosfamide
is a chloro-isophosphoramide prodrug activated by hepatic Cytochrome P450 enzymes.
Both compounds are used for the treatment of cancer. Ifosfamide has been approved by the
FDA while evofosfamide is currently in the late stage of clinical development. The purpose of
this study is to compare efficacy and safety profile of evofosfamide and ifosfamide in …
Abstract
Evofosfamide (TH-302) is a hypoxia-activated prodrug of the cytotoxin bromo-isophosphoramide. In hypoxic conditions Br-IPM is released and alkylates DNA. Ifosfamide is a chloro-isophosphoramide prodrug activated by hepatic Cytochrome P450 enzymes. Both compounds are used for the treatment of cancer. Ifosfamide has been approved by the FDA while evofosfamide is currently in the late stage of clinical development. The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety profile of evofosfamide and ifosfamide in preclinical non-small cell lung cancer H460 xenograft models. Immunocompetent CD-1 mice and H460 tumor-bearing immunocompromised nude mice were used to investigate the safety profile. The efficacy of evofosfamide or ifosfamide, alone, and in combination with docetaxel or sunitinib was compared in ectopic and intrapleural othortopic H460 xenograft models in animals exposed to ambient air or different oxygen concentration breathing conditions. At an equal body weight loss level, evofosfamide showed greater or comparable efficacy in both ectopic and orthotopic H460 xenograft models. Evofosfamide, but not ifosfamide, exhibited controlled oxygen concentration breathing condition-dependent antitumor activity. However, at an equal body weight loss level, ifosfamide yielded severe hematologic toxicity when compared to evofosfamide, both in monotherapy and in combination with docetaxel. At an equal hematoxicity level, evofosfamide showed superior antitumor activity. These results indicate that evofosfamide shows superior or comparable efficacy and a favorable safety profile when compared to ifosfamide in preclinical human lung carcinoma models. This finding is consistent with multiple clinical trials of evofosfamide as a single agent, or in combination therapy, which demonstrated both anti-tumor activity and safety profile without severe myelosuppression.
Taylor & Francis Online